Property sale and purchase: GST

Important to get the GST component right

Generally speaking, GST on a property sale and purchase between two GST-registered entities results in a ‘GST neutral’ position for both the seller and the buyer. It’s essential that the sale and purchase agreement contains the correct wording, particulars and information in respect of the GST position of the parties to the agreement.

If, however, the parties to the agreement have not correctly recorded their respective GST positions, it can result in a situation where a GST liability is triggered. This can mean the seller would effectively receive a 15 percent reduction of the contracted purchase price (as they may have to return 15 percent of the purchase price to Inland Revenue). Or, a buyer may end up having to pay an additional 15 percent on the purchase price if the agreement turns out to be ‘plus GST’.

It’s vital that the GST position of buyer and seller is recorded accurately in order to avoid a possible nasty surprise at settlement.

Correctly recording the GST position

The front page of a standard ADLS/REINZ agreement for sale and purchase requires a seller to warrant to the buyer as to their GST status. This is a matter of fact and the seller will either be registered for GST or they won’t be. They will either be required to return GST on the purchase price, or they will not.

Logically, this affects the purchase price a seller is willing to accept.

The parties must also elect whether or not the transaction will be plus GST (if any), or inclusive of GST.

It is important to note that if no election is made as to the GST status of the transaction, then the agreement will deem the contract price to be inclusive of GST.

Recording the GST particulars

Any further GST information must be included in the GST Schedule to the agreement. This information is used to determine whether or not a GST obligation will exist, or not, for both the seller and the buyer.

It is not always known at the time of signing the agreement whether or not a buyer will be GST-registered or not. Often a buyer will nominate another party to complete the purchase, or may sign the agreement in the name of a non-registered GST entity and plan to nominate a GST-registered entity before settlement, or vice versa.

This means that a seller does not always know with absolute certainty whether the ultimate purchaser of the property will be registered for GST or not.

The agreement contains mechanisms to amend the GST information before settlement. Therefore, it’s possible for a buyer to sign a contract in the name of a GST-registered entity, then nominate a non-GST registered entity to complete the settlement.

Why does this matter?

If a seller is registered for GST and the contract price is treated as being inclusive of GST (whether by means of an election by the parties, or the parties neglecting to make an election as to the GST status of the transaction, or a buyer opting to change their GST status) this will usually mean that the seller will need to return the GST on the purchase price to the IRD.

Should GST be payable on a transaction as a result of any of the situations discussed above and the purchase price is recorded as plus GST (if any), the buyer would be liable to pay the GST to the seller as part of the property transaction.

Many real estate agents will facilitate the signing of the agreement, and many buyers and sellers may enter into contracts entirely unaware of the GST implications, and the workings and treatment of GST under the agreement, without accounting or legal advice. The consequences of this can be that a GST liability is triggered which the parties were unaware of and hadn’t anticipated at the time of signing the agreement.

What should you do?

Regardless of your experience level in buying or selling property, commercially or residentially, it is imperative that you get professional advice to guide you on navigating the minefield that GST can be.

Often, GST is taken for granted as being ‘not applicable’ or ‘zero rated’ or ‘not relevant to you’ and, sometimes, this is the case. In fact, in most situations, it is the case.

The GST situation, however, can catch out even the most experienced and knowledgeable property people. Your professional advisors are here to work with you in making those decisions.

© NZ LAW Limited, 2019. Aspiring Law is proud to be a member of NZ LAW Limited, an association of 55 law practices working together to proactively share ideas and expertise for the benefit of our clients.

Residential property Buying residential property Selling residential property Commercial property Selling commercial property Buying commercial property

Aspiring articles

  • Elise & Roas

    Young lawyers at Aspiring Law

    We're delighted to welcome two new faces to our Aspiring Law team. Rosa Garcia Knight and Elise Streat bring fresh energy and expertise to our firm and embody our commitment to providing clear, client-focused legal services within our community.
  • Blank page and pencil

    Parents' fiduciary duties to their children: Where do they end?

    A recent Supreme Court case, known as the Alphabet Case, tackled the complex question of how far a parent's legal responsibilities extend, particularly when family assets are placed in trusts. The Court confirmed that while parents have special legal duties to their children during childhood, these obligations usually end when children become adults. Find out what this important case means for family trusts and how potential law reforms could affect your estate planning.
    Trusts and Life planning
  • Older couple playing jenga

    Changes ahead for the rights of retirement village residents

    While retirement facilities offer attractive lifestyle options, understanding your legal rights is crucial. Unlike traditional home ownership, retirement village residents don't own their units outright but instead operate under an Occupation Right Agreement (ORA). With the Retirement Villages Act now 24 years old, significant reforms are being proposed to better protect residents' interests. Learn what these proposed changes could mean for current and future residents.
    Residential property Trusts and Life planning
  • Bullseye

    Beyond the Employment Agreement: Employing good staff is one thing, but how do you keep them?

    While finding talented staff is challenging, retaining them can be even more complex. The good news? You don't need to be a perfect employer - just a fair and reasonable one. Recent Employment Court guidance provides a practical "target" approach to good employment practices, where best practice is the bullseye, but hitting anywhere on the target still counts as fair and reasonable. Learn the golden rules that can transform you into an employer that good employees want to stick with for the long haul.
    Employment & HR